Databricks: What Is That?
For a long time, Python + pandas was more than enough for me.
Read some data, process it, send/ save the result somewhere.
Simple. Familiar. Productive.
Until one day… it wasn’t.
–
My Usual Flow: Python + Pandas
My default approach was always the same:
- Use pandas to read data
- Apply business logic
- Push results to another system
It worked well, especially for:
- Small to medium datasets
- One-off jobs
- Quick experiments
If you’ve written backend scripts or data utilities in Python, this probably feels familiar.
–
When Pandas Starts to Hurt
As data grew, so did the problems:
- 🚨 Data no longer fits nicely into memory
- 🚨 Scripts become slower as data grows
- 🚨 Running multiple jobs at the same time becomes painful
- 🚨 “Which machine should this run on?” suddenly matters
- 🚨 Sharing scripts with teammates isn’t straightforward
At some point, you realize:
Pandas is great — but it’s still single-machine thinking.
This is where Databricks entered my life.
–
Enter Databricks (Without the Hype)
I didn’t move to Databricks because I wanted to “do big data”.
I moved because I wanted:
- To keep writing Python
- To stop worrying about machine size
- To process larger datasets safely
- To schedule jobs without duct tape
Databricks is essentially:
- A managed platform for Apache Spark
- With notebooks
- With scheduling
- With collaboration built in
You write code, Databricks worries about the rest.
–
A Typical Flow (From My Actual Work)
Here’s what my day-to-day flow looks like now:
- 📚 Data already exists in the Databricks Catalog
- 📓 I create a Python notebook
- 🔄 Read data using Spark
- 🧠 Apply business logic
- 📤 Publish results to SQS
- ⏰ Schedule it to run every 3 hours
No servers to provision. No EC2 sizing debates.
–
Reading Data with Spark (Feels Familiar)
Instead of Pandas, I now use PySpark:
df = spark.read.table("catalog_name.schema_name.source_table")
Under the hood, Spark:
- Splits data
- Processes it in parallel
- Handles datasets much larger than memory
–
Doing Business Logic (Still Just Python)
from pyspark.sql.functions import col
processed_df = (
df
.filter(col("status") == "ACTIVE")
.withColumn("total_amount", col("price") * col("quantity"))
)
–
The rest
After processing, I can:
- Write results back to tables
- Send data to external systems (like SQS)
- Schedule notebooks to run automatically
–
Why Spark Beats Pandas Here (Simply Put)
| Pandas | Spark (via Databricks) | |
|---|---|---|
| Single-machine | Distributed across many machines | |
| Limited by RAM | Scales with cluster size | |
| Manual scheduling | Built-in job scheduling | |
| Great for small data | Handles big data seamlessly |
–
I:
- Still write Python
- Still think in business logic
Just stopped worrying about scale and infrastructure
Databricks + Spark let me grow without rewriting how I think.
If you’re comfortable with Python and Pandas, this transition is far less scary than it sounds.